Young people on a site visit, listening to a facilitator

Air

What does the CPCB AQI actually measure?

Learn

It measures the concentration of up to eight pollutants at a monitoring station, converts each to a 0–500 sub-index using CPCB's published breakpoints, and reports the highest of them. It does not measure air quality as a single physical quantity — there is no such quantity. Everything downstream of that, including the city figure quoted in the news, is arithmetic on station values.

What the index is built from

The eight pollutants, the averaging periods, and the rule that decides whether a station gets a number at all.

The National Air Quality Index was launched by CPCB in 2014. It covers PM2.5, PM10, nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide, carbon monoxide, ozone, ammonia and lead. Each has its own breakpoint table mapping concentration to sub-index, because the same mass of two different pollutants does not do the same harm.

The averaging periods differ by pollutant: 24 hours for PM2.5, PM10, NO₂, SO₂, NH₃ and lead; eight hours for CO and ozone. So a single AQI value is assembled from windows of different lengths ending at the same moment.

A station's AQI is only computed when at least three pollutants have valid data, and PM2.5 or PM10 must be one of them. A station short of that reports nothing rather than a partial index — which is why the count of reporting stations in a city moves through the day.

Breakpoint
The concentration at which a pollutant's sub-index crosses a band boundary. Published per pollutant by CPCB.
Minimum-three rule
No AQI without three valid pollutants including a particulate. It is why stations drop in and out of the count.
City AQI
CPCB's published figure for a city: an average across stations, weighted by a two-kilometre population grid.

The bands, and the standard underneath them

The index bands describe. The NAAQS limit is the thing with legal force.

Top of the ‘Satisfactory’ band

100 AQI

CPCB National Air Quality Index, 2014

Bottom of ‘Severe’

401 AQI

CPCB National Air Quality Index, 2014

PM2.5, 24-hour mean

60 µg/m³

CPCB, NAAQS 2009

PM10, 24-hour mean

100 µg/m³

CPCB, NAAQS 2009

An AQI of 100 is where CPCB's own bands stop calling the air satisfactory, and it corresponds to the 24-hour standard for the governing pollutant. Above that, the index is describing air that is over a notified limit.

Delhi's air, now

Which number you are being shown

Three different figures circulate as "Delhi's AQI" and they are not the same number.

The station value. One monitor, worst sub-index. This is the only figure that is a direct reading of anything.

CPCB's city figure. A population-weighted average across the city's reporting stations. It is the official number and it is designed to describe the city as a whole.

The worst monitor, named. What this site publishes, with the unweighted station mean printed beside it as a cross-check. It answers a different question: not how the city is doing, but what the worst-off part of it is breathing.

None of the three is wrong. Quoting one and citing another is.

What this number cannot tell you

  • It cannot be compared with an AQI from another country. The United States, China and the European Union use different breakpoints and different pollutant sets — a US AQI of 150 is not an Indian AQI of 150.
  • It cannot be interpolated between stations. An AQI is defined at a monitor, and the space between two monitors has no published value.
  • It cannot distinguish a genuinely clean hour from a sensor that stopped reporting. A missing station is missing, not zero.
  • It saturates. At the top of the scale it stops separating bad from far worse.

Where this comes from

Every figure above is read out of one of these, at the address printed beside it.

Reuse freely — CC BY 4.0. The grant covers this page. Each source above keeps its own terms, which is why every one of them is named.

Next

The reading this explains, the explanations next to it, and the one place to stand in it.